Best Picture Reviews: Around The World In 80 Days

Unknown-2The year is 1956 and the Best Picture Oscar goes to Michael Anderson’s Around The World In 80 Days. (Not to be confused with the Disney remake with Jackie Chan) Oh boy, and I thought Marty was hard to get an opinion on, this movie is all over the place.

Phileas Fogg (David Niven) makes a wager that he can travel, well, around the world in 80 days, accompanied by his butler. (Cantinflas – I Swear That’s The Actors Name) Along the way, he meets an inspector (Robert Newton), and a princess (Shirley McLaine) who I swear is even blander than Aurora.

I have never seen a film that was so boring and so investing at the same time. On the one hand, even though the plot is relatively simple, it can be hard to follow if you’re not paying attention. And it can be hard to pay attention sometimes considering how long a lot of scenes drag. There is no real standout in the cast, the editing drags, and there really is only one cool shot in the film. (The dumbwaiter shot, can’t find a picture.)

It would be easy to dislike this film if not for one thing. It. Is. Beautiful. The production design is so detailed and rich, and you feel like you’re there with these characters. I know a lot of  it was shot on location, but there had to be some sets for indoor scenes. And the costume design is just wonderful and so varied. The score is also fun to listen to, and a few impressive visual effects are used. It is a wonderful, wonderful film for the eyes and ears.

But not so much for the brain and heart. It’s entertaining, sure. But I can’t say i’d really recommend it seeing as how there’s much better films to watch. It’s an enjoyable film,  And some sequences, particularly a train scene near the end, are fun. A well made spectacle, just needed better writing and editing.

***1/2

One thought on “Best Picture Reviews: Around The World In 80 Days

  1. I saw this movie with my mother when it first came out. She liked David Niven. In fact, she had a crush on him for years. We both liked the movie at the time, but I can understand it better now with your analysis. Great!. Keep up the good work

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s